Everything about this book sounds good. I'm up for the challenge it's more a matter of finding the time! Some of those prologue titles already made me laugh - the whole format is intriguing. I had a little trouble with the dense writing of I, the Supreme last year, but it too was well worth it - though this book sounds like it will give me a little more to think about. Thanks for this excellent review! This book will definitely take you some time - it took me about a week and a half to get through it I kept having to re-read difficult passages , and then another several days to figure out how to write about it.
But if you do get to it, it'd be really interesting to hear what someone else thinks! This is one of those books that just offers a million interpretations and a million things to think about. I was JUST reading about this on the publisher's website, and thinking it sounded super-intriguing, and here you are confirming me in that opinion! Thanks for the review! Post a Comment. But where is it? Is it in Art, in Conduct, in Understanding, in Passion? In Cervantes, or Beethoven, or Wagner, or in some great delirium: in adoring intonation, dazzled by Walt Whitman's Man?
Translator Margaret Schwartz likens his place in literary mythology to the role of Socrates: as the founder of a new, uniquely Argentinian way of looking at eternal things who dramatically influenced ensuing generations, his voice and teachings revealed through the writings of his students.
- New & Noteworthy.
- The Telegraph Bookshop!
- Oh no, there's been an error.
- The Economics of Forced Labor: The Soviet Gulag.
Other prologues, in dense and difficult but ultimately rewarding prose, set up the mystical underpinnings of the main story. Posted by Eileen at PM. Labels: Argentinian Literature , Videos. February 21, at AM E. Fay said February 21, at AM Emily said February 21, at PM Post a Comment. Newer Post Older Post Home.
Subscribe to: Post Comments Atom. About Me Eileen Former book blogger, now on Goodreads. View my complete profile. Where I am now Goodreads profile. I think it's a failure, a very ambitious failure. Just because the book is a failure though doesn't mean that I hated it, or that I feel it I felt very ambivalent for the book itself, but I am happy the book exists.
Just because the book is a failure though doesn't mean that I hated it, or that I feel it should be raged against. For the sake of gathering up votes it would be more strategic to hate the book and hurl anger because how dare a writer create something that a I don't enjoy and b that doesn't succeed. I could rage against the book, and then top off the review with claiming that anyone who does enjoy the book has something wrong with them.
I'd get more votes for doing this. But it wasn't that kind of book for me. This book has the potential to be maddening.
- Do Over Dogs: Give Your Dog A Second Chance For A First Class Life (Dogwise Training Manual).
- Loaves, Fishes, and Leftovers: Sharing Faiths Deep Questions.
- Telegraph Picks of the Week!
- Services on Demand.
- Thinking Strategically: The Competitive Edge in Business, Politics, and Everyday Life.
But, if you find a book with a hundred pages of prologues annoying, just for the sake of it's 'cuteness' or quirkiness at having a hundred pages of prologues, well you have no reason to complain. The copy on the back of the book makes it pretty clear what you are getting yourself into.
At the Front of the Rearguard
If you can read that and then get annoyed at the authors style, well you should really work on those critical faculties of yours. As opposed to what you've been told, generally you can judge a book by its cover , and pretty accurately too. Anyway, where was I?
I don't remember. Let's just start a new train of thought. I love not like anymore that this book exists. I love that sometime in the early part of the 20th Century some dude gave up his comfortable existence, lived in boarding homes and flophouses, and spent his life writing books that he had no interest in publishing in his lifetime. I like that he helped inspire Borges, and that maybe through his example, Borges realized that the type of idea he and Macedonio shared were suited for the novel, but were better explored in the short story. I love, capital el oh vee ee, LOVE, that this poor quirky lawyer turned street metaphysican wrote a novel in the first half of the 20th century that foresaw the theories of Barthes and Focault but worked out all this 'hip post-modern' type stuff while still firmly encased in a modern framework.
Or in other words kept all of the old time Metaphysical stuff while doing all the stuff that supposedly was only done on the grave of metaphysics. Or to put it another way, this book I think shows that there is a fundamental error to the frameworks of post-structuralism, in respects to it's approach to literature at least, and that this novel may not be the most disciplined and rigorous way of going through all of the questions involved in 'the death of the author', the role of the reader, etc.
And this something is shown in the book's failure. I can't put this exactly to words. I don't know exactly what all of this means. This is an interesting metaphysical book. Maybe re-reading the book and taking lots of notes would help me figure out exactly what I'm thinking the novel is pointing to in failure. I'm curious to hear what David and Karen think of the book.
The Museum of Eterna's Novel (The First Good Novel)
David, because I need to know exactly what I should think of the book. Seriously though, I would like to see what people who aren't going to get hung up on the philosophy would think of this. It is possible that they would get more enjoyment out of this book, not being weighed down with the same thoughts as I was, and able to enter into the absurdist world of "La Novelia" and it's fifty-seven to sixty prologues, depending on what you count as a prologue. View all 19 comments. Jan 11, Jonfaith rated it really liked it. There's no more artistic moment than the fullness of reading in the present.
the museum of eterna's novel
Signature bells and whistles remind the reader incessantly -- this is a novel, nothing but. Disquisitions follow on Love a There's no more artistic moment than the fullness of reading in the present. Disquisitions follow on Love and Suicide and Buenos Aires is redeemed. One can't ask for much more.
Dec 21, Jim Elkins added it Shelves: argentine.
- Obieta, Adolfo de [WorldCat Identities].
- By Ralph Dumain.
- The Museum of Eterna's Novel.
- Archaeological and Anthropological Perspectives on the Native Peoples of Pampa, Patagonia, and Tierra del Fuego to the Nineteenth Century: From the Beginning ... on the Edge (Native Peoples of the Americas).
- Margaret Schwartz | Fordham University - trodoctwinsisri.ml.
This novel, the work of over 25 years, is one of the first and still one of the most complex anti-novels ever written. I am delighted to have discovered it only 60 years late. It was written between and First is the mechanics and proposals of the anti-novel; then there is the psychology, the mood, or the affect that emerges from so many layers of anti-realism.
The Museum of Eterna's Novel - Believer Magazine
The first develops mostly in the first half of the book, which is comprised entirely of fifty prologues to the novel. And Is This The Novel?. The mechanics of the anti-novel. In terms of the ways it articulates its relation to reality and fiction, this book is more sophisticated than the many that have followed it. The mood, the feeling of the novel. At first it seems this may be early twentieth-century idealism and aestheticism. But there is more to it than that.
Throughout the book characters speak of their distances from one another, and the story turns on people coming together in a frail and unrepeatable gathering, and going apart again in separate journeys. Here the President is a novelist, imagining a world in which characters can be moved around in such a way that they suffer and die alone, offstage, as far away in their own worlds as possible. It must have been a difficult couple of pages for him to write, because it tries so hard to think away the experience.
Partly because he feels that if he has not experienced love, or when he does not experience love, his only hope of happiness is to be fictional. It is a way of existing as a trace, in a trance. View 2 comments. Sep 21, Vilma rated it it was amazing Shelves: favorites , this-is-not-a-novel. As a reader I should not be deceived by "imitations of reality" or should it be "limitations"?
I shall not fall into the illusion that there is a logical intrinsication into a literary text which explains clear imbalances into which the characters and also the author are falling, even there is a deep As a reader I should not be deceived by "imitations of reality" or should it be "limitations"? I shall not fall into the illusion that there is a logical intrinsication into a literary text which explains clear imbalances into which the characters and also the author are falling, even there is a deep awareness of non- existence on a metaphysical level.
Should I accept the fragments of this narrative in- conviences? I am trying.